4.7 Review

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in bovine meat and meat products over the last 15 years in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

MEAT SCIENCE
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108394

关键词

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC); Carcasses; Meat products; Beef; Brazil

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal do Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the contamination rate of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in bovine meat and meat products in Brazil is approximately 1%, with the highest rate observed in Mato Grosso state. Analysis of samples from hot carcasses revealed the highest rate of positive samples. Further studies are necessary in Brazil to improve risk assessment and prevention of human STEC infections.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the rate of contamination in bovine meat and meat products with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in Brazil over the last fifteen years. Data were obtained from online databases in February 2020, and 25 papers were selected from 1036 articles identified in the literature search and 13 articles from gray literature, totaling 4286 samples analyzed. The overall rate of STEC was estimated to be 1% in Brazil. The highest rate (9%) was observed in Mato Grosso, followed by Rio Grande do Sul (1%), Goi ' as (1%), and Sao Paulo (1%). Regarding the sample type analyzed, hot carcasses had the highest rate (8%) of positive samples for STEC, followed by cold carcasses (2%) and beef samples (1%). As the available data were concentrated in the Sao Paulo state, the findings of this meta-analysis reveal the need for further studies in Brazil to allow better risk assessment and prevention of human STEC infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据