4.7 Review

Identification of novel mRNA isoforms associated with meat tenderness using RNA sequencing data in beef cattle

期刊

MEAT SCIENCE
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108378

关键词

Meat maturation; MFI; Novel transcripts; RNA-Seq; WBSF

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2009/16118-5, 11/21241-0, 2017/02470-3, 2017/10630-2, 2018/20026-8, 2018/11154-2]
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) - Brazil [001]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/21241-0] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized WBSF and MFI methodologies to measure beef tenderness and identified differentially expressed transcripts associated with tenderness traits, particularly novel mRNA isoforms potentially affecting muscle aging process, suggesting potential candidates for selecting animals with improved meat tenderness.
The Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and myofibrillar fragmentation index (MFI) are complementary methodologies used to measure beef tenderness. Longissimus thoracis samples from the 20 most extreme bulls (out of 80 bulls set) for WBSF (tender (n = 10) and tough (n = 10)) and MFI (high (n = 10) and low (n = 10)) traits were collected to perform transcriptomic analysis using RNA-Sequencing. All analysis were performed through CLC Genomics Workbench. A total of 39 and 27 transcripts for WBSF and MFI phenotypes were DE, respectively. The possible DE novel mRNA isoforms, for WBSF and MFI traits, are myosin encoders (e.g. MYL1 and MYL6). In addition, we identified potential mRNA isoforms related to genes affecting the speed fibers degradation during the meat aging process. The DE novel transcripts are transcripted by genes with biological functions related to oxidative process, energy production and striated muscle contraction. The results suggest that the identified mRNA isoforms could be used as potential candidate to select animals in order to improve meat tenderness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据