4.7 Article

LNG mass flowrate measurement using Coriolis flowmeters: Analysis of the measurement uncertainties

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109258

关键词

LNG mass flowrate; Coriolis mass flowmeter; Young’ s modulus measurement; Corrected Young’ s modulus; Measurement uncertainty; Cryogenic fluid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the uncertainty of CMF for LNG mass flowrate measurement, evaluating the Young's modulus of stainless steel 316 and finding a corrected value with smaller uncertainty at cryogenic temperature. The expanded uncertainty of a CMF for LNG flowrate measurement is estimated to be 0.50%, with the dominating component being the uncertainty of the corrected Young's modulus at cryogenic temperature.
The uncertainty of Coriolis mass flowmeter (CMF) has been investigated for liquefied natural gas (LNG) mass flowrate measurement. The expanded uncertainty of the Young's modulus of stainless steel 316 measured by NIST is evaluated to be 1.90%, taking into consideration the lot-to-lot variability of the material. We have shown that the corrected Young's modulus value at cryogenic temperature (120 K) has a smaller expanded uncertainty of 0.47%, through calibration of the CMF using traceable water calibration facility and a correction term to compensate the Young's modulus change from ambient to cryogenic temperature of 120 K. We have evaluated other mass flowrate measurement uncertainty factors including thermal expansion, pressure correction effect, temperature measurement, zero stability and meter repeatability. The expanded uncertainty of a CMF for LNG flowrate measurement is estimated to be 0.50% with the uncertainty coverage factor k = 2. The dominating component is from the uncertainty of the corrected Young's modulus for stainless steel at cryogenic temperature. This uncertainty analysis shows that a CMF can provide very accurate mass flowrate measurement for LNG custody transfer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据