4.4 Article

ε-Strong Simulation of Fractional Brownian Motion and Related Stochastic Differential Equations

期刊

MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 559-594

出版社

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/moor.2020.1078

关键词

fractional Brownian motion; stochastic differential equation; Monte Carlo simulation

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/S026347/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article introduces an algorithm for simulating fractional Brownian motion, supporting user-specified error bounds and providing different error guarantees for different Hurst indices. Building on this, the algorithm is extended to simulate stochastic differential equations driven by fBM, allowing for efficient estimation of function expectations.
Consider a fractional Brownian motion (fBM) B-H = {B-H(t) : t is an element of [0, 1]} with Hurst index H is an element of (0, 1). We construct a probability space supporting both B-H and a fully simulatable process (B) over cap (H)(epsilon) such that sup(t is an element of[0,1])vertical bar B-H(t) - (B) over cap (H)(epsilon)(t)vertical bar <= epsilon with probability one for any user-specified error bound epsilon > 0. When H > 1/2, we further enhance our error guarantee to the alpha-Holder norm for any alpha is an element of (1/2, H). This enables us to extend our algorithm to the simulation of fBM-driven stochastic differential equations Y = {Y(t) : t is an element of [0, 1]}. Under mild regularity conditions on the drift and diffusion coefficients of Y, we construct a probability space supporting both Y and a fully simulatable process (Y) over cap (epsilon) such that sup(t is an element of[0,1])vertical bar Y(t) - (Y) over cap (epsilon)(t)vertical bar <= epsilon with probability one. Our algorithms enjoy the tolerance-enforcement feature, under which the error bounds can be updated sequentially in an efficient way. Thus, the algorithms can be readily combined with other advanced simulation techniques to estimate the expectations of functionals of fBMs efficiently.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据