4.3 Article

Influence of Chemically Reacting Ferromagnetic Carreau Nanofluid over a Stretched Sheet with Magnetic Dipole and Viscous Dissipation

期刊

MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING
卷 2021, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6652522

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the flow properties of ferromagnetic fluid over a stretched sheet in the presence of a magnetic dipole, considering shear thinning and shear thickening fluids. Numerical solutions were obtained for highly nonlinear coupled partial differential equations using similarity transformations and the shooting method. The results showed that the concentration and thermal boundary layer thicknesses were higher for shear thinning fluids compared to shear thickening fluids, with reverse effects observed for momentum boundary layer thickness.
Due to potential implications, boundary layer analysis of chemically reacting Carreau nanofluid has been carried out to examine flow properties of ferromagnetic fluid over a stretched sheet in the presence of magnetic dipole, for shear thinning and shear thickening fluids. Furthermore, the transportation of heat under thermal radiation, heat generation, the Brownian, and thermophoresis aspects has been evaluated. The dimensionless form of highly nonlinear coupled partial differential equations is obtained using suitable similarity transformations and then solved numerically by well-known bvp4c technique via MATLAB based on the shooting method. The outcomes of physical quantities are presented through graphs and numerical benchmarks. Moreover, outcomes for skin fraction, Sherwood and Nusselt numbers for velocity, concentration, and temperature are also estimated in this study. The present study reveals that the concentration and thermal boundary layer thicknesses were higher for shear thinning (n < 1 fluid when compared with shear thickening (n > 1 fluids, but reverse effects are to be observed for momentum boundary layer thickness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据