4.5 Article

Thermoelectric response of a screen printed silver-nickel thermocouple

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2020.114929

关键词

Thermocouple; Screen-printing; Sintering temperature; Thermoelectric response

资金

  1. European Structural and Investment Funds in the FEDER component, through the Operational Competitiveness and Internationalization Programme (COMPETE 2020) [002814, POCI-01-0247-FEDER-002814]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the use of silver and nickel screen printing inks for thermocouple development on polymeric substrates. The influence of sintering conditions on electrical resistivity and thermoelectric responses was evaluated, showing that the printed sensors performed similarly to a commercial Type-K sensor.
The lack of inks with adequate properties for the development and construction of a fully printed thermocouple requires the adoption of a different approach. Silver and nickel screen printing inks were selected for the sensing materials, considering their low sintering temperature, required for polymer substrates, and its greatest cost-benefit ratio between the existing materials. This work studied the influence of the sintering conditions on the electrical resistivity of screen printed thin-films and the thermoelectric responses of the Ag-Ni thermocouple printed on polymeric substrates. The printed thin-films were thoroughly characterized by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDS), and by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The electric properties were assessed by the Van der Pauw method. Also, the thermoelectric response of the printed sensors was evaluated. The Seebeck coefficient of the printed sensors proves that the thermoelectric response wasn't affected by the sintering level and the achieved surface resistivity. When compared to a commercial sensor (Type-K), although the difference Seebeck coefficient between sensors, the linear behavior between the commercial thermocouple and the printed sensors is very similar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据