4.5 Article

Rapid microwave-assisted fabrication of Al-doped zinc oxide nanorods on a glass substrate for photocatalytic degradation of phenol under visible light irradiation

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2020.114977

关键词

Al-doped zinc oxide; Microwave; Photocatalysis; Nanorods; ZnO

资金

  1. Sultan Qaboos University
  2. Omantel company [IG/DVC/NRC/19/01, EG/SQU-OT/18/03]
  3. Ministry of Education, Sultanate of Oman

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A rapid microwave-assisted process was used to synthesize quasi-aligned Al-doped ZnO nanorods on a glass substrate. The crystal structure, morphology, and optical properties were investigated, with significant changes in morphology and optical properties observed with Al doping, especially at 1% concentration. The photocatalytic degradation of phenol was enhanced by Al-doping due to bandgap narrowing and enhancement of visible light absorption, particularly at 1% Al concentration.
A rapid microwave-assisted process was used to synthesize a quasi-aligned Al-doped ZnO nanorods on a glass substrate. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy were used to investigate the crystal structure and morphological properties while the optical properties of the prepared materials have been examined by UV-visible and photoluminescence spectroscopy. Two different Al concentrations, 1% and 5%, were used to dope ZnO nanorods. The prepared Al-doped ZnO samples were annealed at 350 degrees C-550 degrees C temperature range. 1% AZO sample annealed at 550 degrees C showed the highest visible light absorption. Synthesized NRs surface chemistry have been characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Samples morphology, NRs density and diameter significantly changed with Al doping. Results show that the crystal orientation and surface oxidation states are dependent on Al content. Overall, Al-doping of ZnO NRs enhanced the photocatalytic degradation of phenol, especially at 1% Al due to bandgap narrowing and enhancement of visible light absorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据