4.6 Article

Encapsulation of fragrances in micron-size silk fibroin carriers via coaxial electrohydrodynamic techniques

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.124167

关键词

Fragrance; Encapsulation; Electrostatic atomization; Silk fibroin; Sustained-release; Fabric

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0200301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coaxial electrostatic atomization technology was successfully used to encapsulate volatile fragrances in silk fibroin matrices with l-menthol as a model compound. The fragrance-loaded core-shell fibers and capsules were fabricated with controllable structural characteristics. The fragrance release profile and rate were influenced by the degree of crystallinity of SF matrix and the shell thickness.
Herein, we present the successful application of coaxial electrostatic atomization technology for encapsulation of volatile fragrances in silk fibroin (SF) matrices with l-menthol (MenOH) as a model compound. The fragrance-loaded core-shell fibers and capsules of a mean diameter of 1-2 mu m were fabricated on the same apparatus, and their structural characteristics could be tuned by changing the ratio of a component in core and shell and matching with process parameters. By decreasing the concentration of the core solution, the loading capacity (LC) of electrospun fibers was up to 12 wt% with an encapsulation efficiency (EE) of similar to 46%. The fragrance content of capsules was 4% since a limited amount of MenOH incorporated in the case of electrospray. Impregnation with alcohol was effective in hardening SF shell and thus significantly decreasing the diffusion of aroma molecules. The fragrance release profile and rate of the composites were controlled by the degree of crystallinity of SF matrix and the shell thickness. Also, the fragrance microcapsules could be directly deposited on the fabric surface during electrospray and showed good washing durability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据