4.6 Article

MXene/sodium alginate gel beads for adsorption of methylene blue

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.124123

关键词

Ti3C2Tx; Sodium alginate; Ionic crosslinking; Methylene blue; Adsorption

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFD1100205]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978148, 51828801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ti3C2Tx/SA beads were prepared for enhanced adsorption of methylene blue, showing efficient adsorption and superior reusability. The optimized Ti3C2Tx/SA-30% exhibited a maximum adsorption capacity of 92.17 mg/g at pH 7 and 298 K, maintaining an adsorption efficiency of 81.36% after three cycles. The adsorption process followed pseudo-second-order kinetics and Langmuir isotherm model.
To enhance the adsorption performance of 2D graphene-like materials Ti3C2Tx (T = OH, O, F) on methylene blue (MB) and realize its reuse, sodium alginate (SA) was used to immobilize Ti3C2Tx to form Ti3C2Tx/SA beads. The beads were fabricated with Ti3C2Tx powder and SA by ionic crosslinking. Based on the SEM, FTIR and XRD analysis, Ti3C2Tx was bound to SA tightly, which avoided the loss of adsorbent and improved the adsorption effect. The adsorption characteristics of MB were investigated at different material ratios, temperature, pH and initial concentration. The results indicated that Ti3C2Tx/SA-30% was chosen as the appropriate mass ratio, the maximum adsorption capacity of which was 92.17 mg/g at pH 7 and 298 K. The MB adsorption efficiency was maintained 81.36% after three cycles. The adsorption process was conformed to pseudo-second-order kinetics, and fitted well with Langmuir isotherm model. Thermodynamic analysis suggested that the process of MB adsorbed on Ti3C2Tx/SA beads was endothermic and spontaneous. The results showed that Ti3C2Tx/SA beads had potential application in pollutants removal for efficient adsorption and superior reusability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据