4.6 Article

Chemical stability diagrams as a powerful tool to the synthesis of Cu2SnS3 thin films by chemical bath deposition

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 265, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124478

关键词

Thermodynamic analysis; Equilibrium chemical; Cu2SnS3; Thin films deposition; Physicochemical properties

资金

  1. CONACYT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cu2SnS3 films were successfully produced using a chemical bath method with a low toxicity citrate precursor. Thermodynamic and species distribution analysis helped determine the deposition conditions. The analysis also confirmed the existence of binary precursors under reductive conditions.
Cu2SnS3 films are produced by chemical bath method employing low toxicity citrate precursor taking advantage of the strong complexes formed with Cu(II) and Sn(II). The deposition conditions for Cu2SnS3 thin films were obtained through a thermodynamic analysis of the effect of tin concentration on Cu(II)?Sn(II)-Citrate complexes and Cu(II)?Sn(II)-Citrate-Thiourea system using a species distribution and potential?pH (Eh-pH) analysis. Theoretical analysis of the speciation fraction of Cu(II) and Sn(II) shown that the predominant species at pH equal to 4.5 at 90 ?C are [Cu2(Cit)2OH]3- and [Sn2(Cit)2]2-. For the Cu(II)?Sn(II)-Citrate-Thiourea system at 90 ?C, the Eh-pH diagrams established that binary precursors, Cu2S and SnS2, would be obtained under basic pH conditions. Subsequently, Cu2SnS3 films were synthetized at 90 ?C at pH equal to 8 by keeping fixed the molar relationships complexing agent-metal and sulfur-metal. The redox potentials were measured in solution and chemical equilibrium diagrams were constructed, confirming the existence of binary precursors under reductive conditions. Characterization of structural, electronic and transport properties indicated that Cu2SnS3 fabricated by chemical bath deposition have monoclinic crystal structure, a direct band gap energy of 1.70 eV and p-type conductivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据