4.7 Article

Anisotropy in the tensile creep behaviors of a hot-rolled Mg-5.5wt%Y alloy sheet

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110843

关键词

Magnesium; Creep; Anisotropy; Twin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52071344, 51974376, 51771230]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2019JJ40376]
  3. Key Research Program of Hunan Province [2019WK2062]
  4. Distinguished Professor Project of Central South University [202045009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the tensile creep anisotropy of a hot-rolled Mg-5.5 wt%Y alloy sheet was investigated. It was found that a poor creep resistance was obtained along the normal direction due to stress concentration induced by twin boundaries, while a good creep resistance was achieved along the rolling and transverse directions. Additionally, the addition of 5.5 wt%Y was shown to enhance crack resistance of grain boundaries over that of twin boundaries in Mg-Y based alloys.
In this work, the tensile creep anisotropy was investigated in a hot-rolled Mg-5.5 wt%Y alloy sheet. The loading directions were performed along rolling, transverse and normal directions (RD, TD and ND), respectively. The results showed that a poor creep resistance was obtained along ND due to serious stress concentration induced by high-density twin boundaries blocking dislocations. While a similarly excellent creep resistance was obtained along RD and TD due to pyramidal c + a slip contributes to the strain hardening during creep process. Meanwhile, this work found that an addition of 5.5 wt%Y could enhance the crack resistance of grain boundary over that of twin boundary. When twin boundaries were heavily generated to block dislocations during tensile creep, crack initiation occurred rapidly. It is suggested that both the density of twin boundaries and the Y content should be considered for improving the creep resistance of Mg-Y based alloys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据