4.7 Article

Haloferax mediterranei Cells as C50 Carotenoid Factories

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md19020100

关键词

Haloferax mediterranei; bacterioruberin; carotenoids; C; N ratio; osmotic stress

资金

  1. MINECO Spain [RTI2018-099860-B-I00]
  2. University of Alicante [VIGROB-309]
  3. Andalusian Government [BIO-214]
  4. Plan Propio de Investigacion of the University of Huelva, Spain
  5. Valencian Community Government [ACIF/2019/043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that different environmental and nutritional conditions have a significant impact on the growth and carotenoid accumulation dynamics in Haloferax mediterranei. The use of a two-step process was evaluated for optimal carotenoid yield.
Haloarchaea produce C50 carotenoids such as bacterioruberin, which are of biotechnological in-terest. This study aimed to analyze the effect of different environmental and nutritional conditions on the cellular growth and dynamics of carotenoids accumulation in Haloferax mediterranei. The maximum production of carotenoids (40 mu g center dot mL(-1)) was obtained during the stationary phase of growth, probably due to nutrient-limiting conditions (one-step culture). By seven days of culture, 1 mL culture produced 22.4 mg of dry weight biomass containing 0.18 % (w/w) of carotenoids. On the other hand, carbon-deficient cultures (low C/N ratio) were observed to be optimum for C50 bacterioruberin production by Hfx. mediterranei, but negatively affected the growth of cells. Thus, a two-steps process was evaluated for optimum carotenoids yield. In the first step, a nutri-ent-repleted culture medium enabled the haloarchaea to produce biomass, while in the second step, the biomass was incubated under osmotic stress and in a carbon-deficient medium. Under the conditions used, the obtained biomass contained 0.27% (w/w) of carotenoids after seven days, which accounts for 58.49 mu g center dot mL(-1) of carotenoids for a culture with turbidity 14.0.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据