4.4 Editorial Material

Deploying triple artemisinin-based combination therapy (TACT) for malaria treatment in Africa: ethical and practical considerations

期刊

MALARIA JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03649-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK government's Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
  2. Wellcome Trust [106698, 096527]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malaria is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in African children, with artemisinin-based combination therapy as the first-line treatment. However, drug resistance in Southeast Asia poses a threat, and the development of triple artemisinin-based combination therapy is seen as a potential solution with ethical and practical considerations.
Malaria remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Africa, particularly in children under five years of age. Availability of effective anti-malarial drug treatment is a cornerstone for malaria control and eventual malaria elimination. Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is worldwide the first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria, but the ACT drugs are starting to fail in Southeast Asia because of drug resistance. Resistance to artemisinins and their partner drugs could spread from Southeast Asia to Africa or emerge locally, jeopardizing the progress made in malaria control with the increasing deployment of ACT in Africa. The development of triple artemisinin-based combination therapy (TACT) could contribute to mitigating the risks of artemisinin and partner drug resistance on the African continent. However, there are pertinent ethical and practical issues that ought to be taken into consideration. In this paper, the most important ethical tensions, some implementation practicalities and preliminary thoughts on addressing them are discussed. The discussion draws upon data from randomized clinical studies using TACT combined with ethical principles, published literature and lessons learned from the introduction of artemisinin-based combinations in African markets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据