4.7 Article

Enamine Organocatalysts for the Thiol-Michael Addition Reaction and Cross-Linking Polymerizations

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 54, 期 4, 页码 1693-1701

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02128

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFMRSEC [DMR1420736, CHE 130122296]
  2. DARPA [W911NF1920024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes an efficient enamine organocatalyzed thiol-Michael click reaction and its broad application in cross-linking polymerizations. The nucleophilicity of the enamines used is crucial for the reaction efficiency and overall yields, with in situ formation of an enamine via photo-deprotection of an amine showing promising results in facilitating thiol-Michael reactions and improving functional group conversion rates.
This article describes an efficient enamine organocatalyzed thiol-Michael click reaction and its broad application in cross-linking polymerizations. A series of enamines was shown to catalyze the thiol-Michael reaction via a nucleophilic pathway. By varying the amines as well as the ring size of the ketones, enamines were designed with broad ranges of nucleophilic character ranging from 11 to 17 on the Mayr nucleophilicity scale. Upon evaluating the enamines' organocatalytic effect on the kinetics of reactions involving a thiol and Michael acceptor, wherein butyl 3-mercaptopropionate and 1-hexyl acrylate were used as model reactants, enamines were shown to outperform their base analogs. The efficiency and overall reaction yields, ranging from 11 to 92% based on the thiol conversion, were highly dependent upon the nucleophilicity of the enamines employed. Interestingly, in situ formation of an enamine via photo-deprotection of an amine in the presence of cyclic ketones facilitated the thiol-Michael reaction efficiently while simultaneously enabling higher functional group conversion. This efficiency in the reaction kinetics and conversion was extended to multifunctional derivatives, which resulted in the formation of highly cross-linked polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据