4.7 Article

Mass transfer and texture characteristics of fish skin during deep-fat frying, electrostatic frying, air frying and vacuum frying

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110494

关键词

Tilapia skin; Air frying; Vacuum frying; Electrostatic frying; Deep-fat frying

资金

  1. Fisheries Agency of the Republic of China (Taiwan) [108AS-3.4.1-FA-F1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that air frying and vacuum frying resulted in fish skins with the lowest fat content (9.8% and 27.7%, respectively) and smooth, uniform microstructures. In contrast, traditional deep-fat frying and electrostatic frying led to higher fat content (47.6% and 46.3%) and uneven microstructures.
Fried fish skins are snacks with rich flavor in Asian. However, the high fat content about 50% is not good for health. It is possible to reduce the oil content while maintain its fried taste and texture by optimized frying methods. The effects of different frying approaches such as air frying, vacuum frying, electrostatic frying and traditional deep-fat frying on the oil uptake, moisture loss, breaking force, color, and microstructure attributes of fried fish skins were studied. Air and oil frying were performed at 180 degrees C for 2-12 min. Vacuum frying was conducted at lower temperature 120 degrees C for 4-24 min. Results showed that air fried and vacuum fried fish skins had the lowest fat contents (9.8% and 27.7%, respectively) and showed smooth, uniform microstructures. On the contrary, holy, irregular and non-uniform microstructures were obtained by traditional deep-fat frying and electrostatic frying due to high heat and rapid mass transfer occurred. The oil uptake (47.6% and 46.3% fat content, respectively) and browning reactions were also significant. Air frying developed a slower water evaporation rate and higher fish skin puffing ratio, which was suggested to be an alternative to traditional deep-fat frying.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据