4.7 Article

Synergistic antibacterial effects of reuterin and catechin against Streptococcus mutans

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110527

关键词

Reuterin; Catechin; Streptococcus mutans; Biofilm; Antibacterial effects

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project [2018YFD0502404]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China
  3. Academic Backbone Plan of Northeast Agricultural University [18XG27]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of reuterin and catechin shows synergistic antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus mutans by inhibiting growth, biofilm formation, water-insoluble glucan production, and virulence genes expression. This novel combination demonstrates potential as a natural antibacterial agent for the prevention of oral diseases.
Reuterin is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent widely used to control pathogenic bacteria. Antimicrobial properties of catechin have been well described. However, no information is available regarding their combination effects. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the antibacterial effects of reuterin and catechin alone or in combination against Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans). We found a clear synergistic effect of reuterin in combination with catechin on inhibiting growth of S. mutans. Combined treatment with reuterin and catechin resulted in reduced biofilm biomass and water-insoluble glucan content, and visibly damaged the biofilm structure. Moreover, the expression of biofilm-associated genes was significantly down-regulated after exposure to the combination. Our results demonstrate that the combination of reuterin and catechin exhibits synergistic antimicrobial activity against S. mutans by repressing growth, biofilm formation, water-insoluble glucan production, and virulence genes expression. These findings support this novel combination can be used as a natural antibacterial agent for the prevention of oral diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据