4.7 Article

Vegetable oils protect phycocyanin from thermal degradation during cooking of spirulina-based crostini

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110776

关键词

Leavened bakery foods; Spirulina; Phycocyanin; Extra virgin olive oil; Sunflower oil

资金

  1. POR FSE 2014-2020 - Progetto Strategico STREAMING, sottoprogetto PhotoWING (Regione Toscana, Italy) [UNIFI_FSE2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that extra virgin olive oil or sunflower oil have a protective effect against the degradation of phycocyanin in spirulina, helping to maintain the content of phycocyanin in the product.
Phycocyanin is a well-known bioactive pigment contained in cyanobacteria, such as Arthrospira platensis (commonly known as spirulina), and used in the food and beverage industry. One of the main problems that affects spirulina-based bakery products is phycocyanin degradation during cooking, being this pigment extremely sensitive to heat. The main goal of this work was to evaluate the protective effect against phycocyanin degradation of extra virgin olive (EVO) oil or sunflower oil, by applying thermal treatments directly on A. platensis F&M-C256 biomass and on A. platensis F&M-C256-based crostini, as well as on phycocyanin powder. After cooking, A. platensis F&M-C256 crostini incorporated with EVO or sunflower oil (log oil/100g of dough) maintained about 90% of the phycocyanin originally present in the cyanobacterial biomass. When pure tocopherol was added to the biomass in the same amounts, a significant protective effect against phycocyanin degradation was observed. Tocopherol contained in EVO and sunflower oils is the putative main responsible for the protective action against phycocyanin degradation. Therefore, the incorporation of vegetable oils into the dough can be a useful tool for the food industries that use A. platensis biomass and/or phycocyanin as a natural food coloring and bioactive component for bakery products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据