4.7 Article

SEC-MS/MS determination of amino acids from mango fruits and application of the method for studying amino acid perturbations due to post harvest ripening

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110680

关键词

Postharvest ripening; Amino acids; SEC-MS/MS; Calcium carbide; Principal component analysis

资金

  1. Food Safety and Standard Authority of India [73/R&D/Artificial Ripeners/RARD/2016-FSSAI, GAP-0602]
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel analytical method was developed for the quantification of free amino acids in mango fruit pulp, showing significant changes in amino acid profiles under different ripening agents. The principal component analysis indicated that fruits ripened with calcium carbide are similar to naturally ripened fruits.
A simple and sensitive size exclusion chromatography - liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (SEC-MS/MS) based analytical method was developed for the quantification of free amino acids from mango fruit pulp samples. The pulp samples were extracted with 70:30 acetonitrile:water containing 0.05 mol/L formic acid and treated with activated charcoal to remove the phenolic and hydrophobic impurities. The amino acids were isolated by strong cation exchange process and quantified by SEC-MS/MS. The method was validated for linearity, the limit of detection and limit of quantification. The LOQ values were observed in the range of 0.2-145 ng/g at 10:1 signal to noise ratio and the interday and intraday precisions were below 15%. The developed method was applied for the analysis of amino acids in mango fruits ripened with ethylene, calcium carbide and ethephon ripening agents. Alanine was observed as major amino acid and other amino acids showed significant changes, which were studied by ANOVA and principal component analysis (PCA). The PCA studies showed that the fruits ripened with calcium carbide are similar to that of naturally ripened fruits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据