4.3 Article

Plasma checkpoint protein levels and galectin-9 in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus

期刊

LUPUS
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 998-1004

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09612033211002275

关键词

SLE; child; checkpointproteins; galectin-9; IL-2Rα

资金

  1. Hacettepe University Scientific Research Unit [THD-2020-18803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found Galectin-9 and IL-2R alpha to be good markers for disease activity in childhood SLE, with significant correlations between SLEDAI scores and IL-2R alpha, Gal-9, and PDL1. Additionally, checkpoint protein levels did not differ significantly among different clinical clusters in SLE.
SLE is a disease of the adaptive immune system where T lymphocyte dysfunction has an important role as well. We assessed the plasma levels of checkpoint receptors expressed on T cells, along with Galectin-9 to reflect type-1 IFN activity and IL-2R alpha in childhood SLE patients. Forty-nine children with SLE and15 healthy controls were included. SLEDAI scores were evaluated at the time of sampling. CD25 (IL-2R alpha), 4-1BB, B7.2 (CD86), TGF-beta 1, CTLA-4, PD-L1, PD-1, Tim-3, LAG- 3, Galectin-9 levels were studied by cytometric bead-based multiplex assay panel. Galectin-9 and PD-L1 were significantly higher in SLE patients. Other checkpoint proteins and IL-2R alpha were also higher but did not reach statistical significance. There were significant correlations between SLEDAI and IL-2R alpha, Galectin-9 and PDL1. There were three clinical clusters: Cluster 1 included patients with no major organ involvement, cluster 2 had predominantly haematological involvement(n=16) and cluster 3 (n=11) had predominantly renal involvement. Checkpoint proteins were not different among these three clusters. Our data supports that Galectin 9 and IL-2R alpha are good markers for disease activity in childhood SLE. We need larger series to evaluate differences between disease clusters in SLE. We failed to show a significant correlation with checkpoint proteins and SLEDAI except for PDL1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据