4.7 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Silenced microRNA-222 suppresses inflammatory response in gestational diabetes mellitus mice by promoting CXCR4 (Retracted article. See vol. 306, 2022)

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118850

关键词

Gestational diabetes mellitus; MicroRNA-222; NLRP3 inflammasome; C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By regulating miR-222, the action of CXCR4 can be promoted, and the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes can be inhibited, thereby alleviating the inflammatory response in gestational diabetes mellitus patients.
Objective: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is induced by multiple factors, and the microRNAs (miRNAs) are well-known to be implicated in GDM progression. We aimed to explore the functional mechanisms of miR-222 in the inflammatory response in GDM by mediating C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) and NLRP3 inflammasomes. Methods: GDM models were established by intraperitoneal injection of streptozocin, and the levels of miR-222 and CXCR4 in GDM patients' placenta tissues as well as GDM mice' placenta and pancreatic tissues were determined. The GDM mice were treated with miR-222 Antagomir/Agomir or overexpressed CXCR4 to evaluate the apoptosis and pathological changes in tissues, and the levels of blood glucose, insulin, biochemical indices, inflammatory factors and inflammasome-related proteins. Importantly, the target relation between miR-222 and CXCR4 was verified. Results: MiR-222 was increased while CXCR4 was decreased in GDM patients and mice. The down-regulated miR222 and up-regulated CXCR4 could promote insulin sensitivity and insulin level, while inhibit apoptosis, inflammation and glucagon level in GDM mice. Moreover, CXCR4 was targeted by miR-222. Conclusion: We demonstrated that the silenced miR-222 could suppress inflammatory response in GDM mice by promoting CXCR4 and inactivating NLRP3 inflammasomes, which may contribute to GDM treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据