4.3 Article

Sequential intensive chemotherapy followed by autologous or allogeneic transplantation for refractory lymphoma

期刊

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
卷 62, 期 7, 页码 1629-1638

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1881516

关键词

Lymphoma; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; bendamustine

资金

  1. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the safety and efficacy of using bendamustine as a bridge to stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma, with findings indicating potential benefits for some patients while also raising the risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasia. Bendamustine did not cause toxicities precluding transplantation, but there were cases of therapy-related myeloid neoplasia observed in some patients, suggesting a need for careful consideration of risks and benefits in clinical decision-making.
We evaluate the safety of bendamustine as a bridge to stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma and residual disease after salvage therapy. Thirty-four subjects without complete responses (CR) received bendamustine 200 mg/m(2)/day for 2 days followed 14 days later by SCT. Sixteen subjects in partial remission (PR) with maximal FDG-PET SUVs <= 8 prior to bendamustine received autologous SCT, while 13 with suboptimal responses were allografted. Five subjects did not proceed to transplant. No bendamustine toxicities precluded transplantation and no detrimental effect on engraftment or early treatment-related mortality (TRM) was attributable to bendamustine. At 1 year, 75% of auto-recipients and 31% of allo-recipients were alive with CR. Two subjects in the autologous arm developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasia (t-MN). In conclusion, a bendamustine bridge to SCT can be administered without early toxicity to patients with suboptimal responses to salvage chemotherapy. However this approach may increase the risk of t-MN. (NCT02059239). Supplemental data for this article is available online at .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据