4.7 Article

Biomarkers associated with blinatumomab outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 2220-2231

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-01089-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Amgen Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified platelets, tumor burden, and percentage of T cells as prognostic and predictive biomarkers for outcomes in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving blinatumomab or chemotherapy. Adjusting these biomarkers may help in identifying subgroups most likely to benefit from blinatumomab treatment.
This study aimed to identify biomarkers for clinical outcomes in a phase 3 clinical study of blinatumomab or chemotherapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive blinatumomab, a BiTE(R) therapy, for 4 weeks (9 mu g/day cycle 1 week 1, 28 mu g/day thereafter) every 6 weeks, or chemotherapy. Baseline blood samples were evaluated to identify biomarkers prognostic (both treatment groups) or predictive (either treatment groups) for overall survival, event-free survival, hematologic remission, minimal residual disease (MRD) response, duration of response, or adverse events. Baseline values were balanced between treatment groups. Prognostic biomarkers were platelets, tumor burden, and percentage of T cells: each 1-log increase in platelets at baseline was prognostic for improved 6-month survival; lower tumor burden was prognostic for hematologic remission; and a higher percentage of CD3(+) T-cells was prognostic for MRD response. Consistent with the BiTE mechanism of action, higher percentage of CD45(+) CD3(+) CD8(+) T cells was associated with hematologic remission following blinatumomab. No examined biomarkers were significant for the risk of grade >= 3 adverse events. Incorporating baseline biomarkers into future studies may help to identify subgroups most likely to benefit from blinatumomab.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据