4.3 Article

Non-lactose-fermenting uropathogenic Escherichia coli from dogs: virulence profile characterization

期刊

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 72, 期 5, 页码 596-603

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/lam.13454

关键词

antibiotic resistance; canine; cystitis; non-lactose-fermenting E. coli; phylogenetic classification; uropathogenic Escherichia coli

资金

  1. Coordination of Improvement of Higher Educational Personnel (CAPES) [001]
  2. CAPES-Computational Biology [23038.010043/2013-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that non-lactose-fermenting E. coli from dogs with hyperadrenocorticism behaves similarly to lactose-fermenting E. coli in terms of virulence, biofilm formation capacity, and antimicrobial susceptibility, exhibiting multidrug resistance. These strains have the pathogenic potential to promote animal infections.
Non-lactose-fermenting Escherichia coli (NLFEC) has a few descriptive studies restricted to human infections. In the present study, isolates of NLFEC obtained from urine samples of dogs with hyperadrenocorticism were characterized regarding their virulence ability, biofilm formation capacity and antimicrobial susceptibility profile. Escherichia coli lactose-fermenting strains from urinary infection in dogs with the same conditions were analysed to provide comparisons. The non-lactose-fermenting E. coli strains were classified as belonging to clade I E. coli, whereas the lactose-fermenting strains were classified in phylogroup B2. All strains presented virulence markers to adhesion, iron acquisition, toxins, colicin and cytotoxin production, and biofilm regulation. Components of the extracellular matrix in addition to the in vitro biofilm formation ability were observed in the strains. Multidrug resistance (MDR) profiles were observed by in vitro susceptibility tests to all NLFEC strains. In summary, non-lactose-fermenting uropathogenic E. coli from dogs behaves similar to lactose-fermenting E. coli, exhibiting MDR profile, and pathogenic potential of promote animal infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据