4.4 Article

Composite solid polymer electrolyte with silica filler for structural supercapacitor applications

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 454-460

出版社

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-020-0695-y

关键词

Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Monomethyl Ether Acrylate (PEGA); Composite Solid Polymer Electrolytes; Supercapacitors; Silica Filler; Structural Supercapacitors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers synthesized composite solid polymer electrolytes (CSPEs) by adding ionic liquids (IL) to poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether acrylate (PEGA), with varying ratios of PEGA and IL. The study showed that the addition of silica filler resulted in lower ionic conductivity and specific capacitance of the synthesized CSPEs.
Structural supercapacitors are energy storage devices that can function as structural materials. We synthesized composite solid polymer electrolytes (CSPEs) from 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate ([EMIm][OTF]), poly (ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether acrylate (PEGA) and functionalized silica filler. Two types of fumed silica were used: one had an unmodified surface, and the other an organically modified surface. The CSPEs were prepared by adding ionic liquids (IL) to the PEGA and the ratios between PEGA and IL were 7: 3 and 5: 5, respectively. The functionalized silica was synthesized by the sol-gel method under acidic conditions using methacryloxypropyl trimethoxysilane (MAPTMS), whereas the effects of silica filler on the electrochemical and thermal properties of CSPEs were investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and differential scanning calorimetry. The ionic conductivity of CSPEs based on PEGA/[OTF]_SiO2 at various concentrations of [EMIm][OTF] was 5.7x10(-4) and 4.8x10(-4)S/cm, and their specific capacitance was 10.0 and 9.5 F/g, respectively. With the addition of silica filler, the ionic conductivity and specific capacitance of the synthesized CSPEs were lower than those of the neat CSPEs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据