4.7 Article

Evolutionary ORB-based model with protective closing strategies

期刊

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106769

关键词

Opening range breakout; Genetic algorithm; Evolutionary computation; Protective closing strategies; Optimization

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan [MOST 109-2221-E-027-106-]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces an evolutionary ORB-based model to optimize thresholds and develop protective closing strategies for enhanced profitability. Through evolutionary computation, rational strategies and parameters were derived, leading to improvements in annual returns by 2.8% and Sharpe ratio by 1.0, while reducing maximum drawdown by half.
Opening range breakout (ORB) is a well-known intraday trading strategy via technical analysis. ORB lacks robustness against market uncertainties (e.g., information from contradictory sources), and does not consider all relevant market characteristics. Furthermore, the closing strategies in generic ORB are not well defined. In this study, we developed an evolutionary ORB-based model, which utilized historical data to optimize thresholds in order to enhance profitability, and developed protective closing strategies aimed at to prevent unacceptable losses. Selecting appropriate thresholds and parameters for ORB is a non-trivial task, due to the fact that the search space exceeds sixty-five thousand options. We used evolutionary computation to derive rational strategies and parameters for ORB. The proposed framework based on a genetic algorithm optimizes the parameters related to threshold selection and protective closing strategies. In experiments, this resulted in annual returns of 9.3% (representing a 2.8% improvement over the original strategy) and Sharpe ratio of 2.5 (an improvement of 1.0), while reducing the maximum drawdown by half. The proposed scheme also reduced computational overhead by 89% compared to a grid search. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据