4.7 Article

A computational study on the aerodynamics of a twin-box bridge with a focus on the spanwise features

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104465

关键词

3D LES; Twin-box; Vortex shedding; Correlations; Force coefficients; Strouhal number; Pressure coefficient distribution; Transversal beam

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BIA2016-76656-R]
  2. Galician regional government [ED431C 2017/72]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness in the frame of the National Program for Promotion of Talent and Employability [BES2014-068418, BIA2013-41965-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studying the wind flow around twin-box decks involves considering the slot distance between girders and the impact of the downwind box immersed in the wake of the upwind box. The presence of transversal beams is found to play a key role in flow correlation loss.
The wind flow around twin-box decks is particularly complex due to the very important role played by the slot distance between girders and the presence of the downwind box that is immersed in the wake of the upwind box. Detailed experimental studies on the three-dimensional flow features of this deck typology are certainly challenging, and CFD simulations have not tackled this problem so far. The goal of this 3D LES piece of research is to shed some light on the complex flow features around twin-box decks, particularly when the deck geometry is fully three-dimensional due to the presence of the transversal beams linking together the deck girders. Integral parameters, mean and instantaneous flow structures and spanwise correlations are studied for a segment of the Stonecutters Bridge. It has been found that the presence of the transversal beam plays a key role in the flow correlation loss, identifying, for instance, the out-of-phase shedding of vortices at different sides of the transversal beam. The numerical results agree well with experimental data in the literature, and offer a richer and more comprehensive explanation for the identified aerodynamic responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据