4.6 Article

Ureteral Stent Placement following Ureteroscopy Increases Emergency Department Visits in a Statewide Surgical Collaborative

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 205, 期 6, 页码 1710-1717

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001653

关键词

ureter; stents; ureteroscopy; urinary calculi; emergency service; hospital

资金

  1. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
  2. Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative - Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found significant variation in the use of stents in Michigan, with stent placement significantly increasing the odds of emergency department visits after surgery. Importantly, omitting stents rarely required subsequent urgent stent placement.
Purpose: Ureteral stents are commonly placed after ureteroscopy. Although studies indicate that stents are associated with patient discomfort, their impact on downstream health services use is unclear. We examined patterns of stent utilization in Michigan and their association with unplanned health care encounters. Materials and Methods: We used the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative's Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stones (MUSIC ROCKS) clinical registry to identify ureteroscopy cases between 2016 and 2019. Factors associated with stent placement were examined using bivariate and multivariable statistics. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated whether stent placement was associated with emergency department visits and hospitalizations within 30 days. Results: We identified 9,662 ureteroscopies and a stent was placed in 7,025 (73%) of these. Frequency of stent use across the 137 urologists varied (11%e100%, p <0.001) and was not associated with total case volume. Factors associated with stent use included age and stone size. Pre-stented cases and renal stones had a decreased odds of stent placement. On multivariable analysis after adjusting for risk factors, stent placement was associated with a 1.25 higher odds of emergency department visit (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.54, p = 0.043) but not hospitalization (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.94-1.76, p = 0.12). In a single high volume practice, 0.5% of cases that omitted a stent required urgent stenting postoperatively. Conclusions: There is substantial variation in the use of stents in Michigan, irrespective of case volume. Stent placement significantly increased the odds of an emergency department visit after surgery. Importantly, stent omission rarely required subsequent urgent stent placement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据