4.7 Article

Treatment with therapeutic anticoagulation is not associated with immunotherapy response in advanced cancer patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-02712-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. NYU Melanoma Spore [P50CA225450]
  2. Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center Support Grant [P30CA016087]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that patients receiving anticoagulation therapy did not experience better treatment outcomes when receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, and were instead more likely to suffer from major or clinically relevant bleeding complications.
Background: Recent preclinical data suggest that there may be therapeutic synergy between immune checkpoint blockade and inhibition of the coagulation cascade. Here, we investigate whether patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and were on concomitant anticoagulation (AC) experienced better treatment outcomes than individuals not on AC. Methods: We studied a cohort of 728 advanced cancer patients who received 948 lines of ICI at NYU (2010-2020). Patients were classified based on whether they did (n = 120) or did not (n = 828) receive therapeutic AC at any point during their treatment with ICI. We investigated the relationship between AC status and multiple clinical endpoints including best overall response (BOR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of bleeding complications. Results: Treatment with AC was not associated with significantly different BOR (P = 0.80), ORR (P =0.60), DCR (P =0.77), PFS (P = 0.59), or OS (P =0.64). Patients who received AC were significantly more likely to suffer a major or clinically relevant minor bleed (P = 0.05). Conclusion: AC does not appear to impact the activity or efficacy of ICI in advanced cancer patients. On the basis of our findings, we caution that there is insufficient evidence to support prospectively evaluating the combination of AC and immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据