4.5 Review

Arsenic exposure from groundwater: environmental contamination, human health effects, and sustainable solutions

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2021.1898504

关键词

Toxicology; methylation; cancer; arsenicosis; drinking water; nanotechnology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenic is naturally occurring but can also contaminate groundwater due to mining, agricultural, and industrial processes. Human exposure to arsenic from contaminated water can lead to acute toxicity and chronic effects, including skin lesions and cancer. Strategies to diminish arsenic in water include physicochemical treatment systems, bioremediation using cyanobacteria and algae, and nanotechnology applications.
Arsenic (As) occurs naturally in geologic conditions, but groundwater contamination might also be found due to the consequences of mining, agricultural and industrial processes. Human exposure to As after drinking contaminated water is commonly associated with acute toxicity outcomes and chronic effects ranging from skin lesions to cancer. Integrated actions from environmental and health authorities are needed to reduce exposure, monitoring outcomes, and promotion of actions to offer sustainable As-safe water alternatives. Considering recent research trends, the present review summarizes and discusses current issues associated with the process and effects of contamination and decontamination in an environmental health perspective. Recent findings reinforce the harmful effects of the consumption of As-contaminated water and broaden the scope of related diseases including intestinal maladies, type 2 diabetes, cancers of bladder, kidneys, lung, and liver. Among the main strategies to diminish or remove As from water, the following are highlighted (1) ion exchange system and membrane filtration (micro, ultra, and nanofiltration) as physicochemical treatment systems; (2) use of cyanobacteria and algae in bioremediation programs and (3) application of nanotechnology for water treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据