4.6 Article

Biological versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Biological or mechanical prostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50-65 years: the ANDALVALVE study

Emiliano A. Rodriguez-Caulo et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY (2019)

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Long-term outcomes of mechanical versus biological aortic valve prosthesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Rocio Diaz et al.

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2019)

Article Oncology

Competing risks in survival data analysis

Almut Dutz et al.

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY (2019)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with infective endocarditis

Ville Kyto et al.

INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY (2019)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Mechanical or Biologic Prostheses for Aortic-Valve and Mitral-Valve Replacement

Andrew B. Goldstone et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2017)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with bioprosthetic valves

Ajay Yadlapati et al.

CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY (2016)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Aortic valve replacement with mechanical vs. biological prostheses in patients aged 50-69 years

Natalie Glaser et al.

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2016)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve in patients aged 50-65 years

Thierry Bourguignon et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY (2016)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patientsaEuro

Per Hostrup Nielsen et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY (2016)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Calcific aortic stenosis

Brian R. Lindman et al.

NATURE REVIEWS DISEASE PRIMERS (2016)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Transcatheter valve-in-valve therapy using 6 different devices in 4 anatomic positions: Clinical outcomes and technical considerations

Lenard Conradi et al.

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2015)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements

Abby J. Isaacs et al.

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2015)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Survival and Long-term Outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 69 Years

Yuting P. Chiang et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2014)

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

The Global Burden of Aortic Stenosis

Jeremy J. Thaden et al.

PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES (2014)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research

Elizabeth A. Stuart et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Aortic Stenosis in the Elderly Disease Prevalence and Number of Candidates for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis and Modeling Study

Ruben L. J. Osnabrugge et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2013)

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document

A. Pieter Kappetein et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2012)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Hancock II Bioprosthesis for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Gold Standard of Bioprosthetic Valves Durability?

Tirone E. David et al.

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY (2010)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study

Vuyisile T. Nkomo et al.

LANCET (2006)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Operative risk of reoperative aortic valve replacement

DD Potter et al.

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY (2005)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Sample size formula for proportional hazards modelling of competing risks

A Latouche et al.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2004)