4.5 Review

Thermoregulatory responses in riverine buffaloes against heat stress: An updated review

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL BIOLOGY
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.102844

关键词

Thermoregulatory responses; Heat stress; Buffaloes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Buffaloes in tropics and subtropics, including India, are at risk of heat stress which can impact their productivity. As homeotherms, buffaloes display various thermoregulatory responses to combat heat stress, with a key role played by heat shock proteins in conferring thermotolerance.
High heat and humidity stress have been a perpetual perilous for the buffalo?s production and productivity in tropics and subtropics including India. Productive potential of livestock?s species including buffaloes is maximum with in thermo-neutral zone (TNZ) and if ambient temperature exceeds TNZ and upper critical temperature expose livestock?s to heat stress conditions. For decades, heat stress has been the prime factor to plummet buffalo?s growth, development, reproduction and production in tropics and subtropics including India. In general, buffaloes are homeotherms and known as temperature regulators as they resist the variations in ambient temperatures. Generally, buffaloes like other livestock?s display amalgamation of thermoregulatory responses to withstand the changes occurred in their micro and macro environment. These thermoregulatory responses are behavioural, physiological, neuro-endocrine and molecular responses acting synergistically to counteract the deleterious effects of heat stress. Amidst all responses, molecular responses play major role to confer thermotolerance through expression of highly conserved family of proteins known as heat shock proteins (HSPs). Despite of these thermoregulatory responses, heat stress prodigiously muddles buffalo?s production and productivity. The present review highlights the thermoregulatory responses manifested by riverine buffaloes against heat stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据