4.7 Article

4E analysis and tri-objective optimization of a triple-pressure combined cycle power plant with combustion chamber steam injection to control NOx emission

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 145, 期 3, 页码 1317-1333

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-10493-5

关键词

Exergy; Exergoeconomic; Combined cycle power plant; Steam injection; Soot emission; Triple-pressure HRSG; Tri-objective optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a novel triple-pressure combined cycle power plant system with heat recovery technology and combustion chamber steam injection to reduce hazardous emissions. Through a comprehensive investigation of energy, exergy, economic, and environmental impacts, a tri-objective optimization is conducted to improve efficiency, lower costs, and reduce emissions.
This article presents a novel triple-pressure combined cycle power plant (CCPP) with a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) configured with heat exchangers of multiple pressure levels, same as the real case. In addition, combustion chamber steam injection is added to the top cycle in order to reduce hazardous emissions. The research investigates energy, exergy, economic, and environmental aspects of the system to initiate sustainable development in said areas. A thorough parametric study is carried out to evaluate the effects of steam injection and other decision variable on emissions and system performance. Then, the total cost rate and the CO2 index are minimized while maximizing the second law efficiency via a tri-objective optimization using the genetic algorithm. The outcome of the economic analysis is that the HRSG has the maximum total cost rate among all the components, namely 0.1673 $/s. The environmental impact assessments indicate that the CO2 and NO emission has considerable molar fractions of 0.035 and 6.88 x 10(-4), respectively. As a result of the tri-objective optimization, a 3D Pareto Frontier is presented, which pointed out the maximum attainable exergy efficiency is 50.32%, as well as the minimum total cost rates of 8.04 $/s and CO2 index of 0.34 kg/kWh. Finally, the scatter distribution of major decision variables revealed the optimum range of decision variables in which the optimum points of the Pareto Frontier are obtained. Accordingly, the scatter distribution showed that 46 kg s(-1) is the optimum value for steam injection flow rate in terms of efficiency, cost and emission optimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据