4.7 Article

Cattaneo-Christov heat flux theory on transverse MHD Oldroyd-B liquid over nonlinear stretched flow

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 147, 期 3, 页码 2749-2759

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-021-10568-x

关键词

Oldroyd-B fluid; Thermal conductivity of temperature; MHD; Heat source; sink; Non-Fourier’ s heat flux

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the hydromagnetic transverse flow of an Oldroyd-B-type liquid with variable thickness using the Cattaneo-Christov model, considering additional impacts of thermal conductivity and heat generation, and numerical solutions were obtained using the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method. The physical response related to velocity and temperature was investigated, showing that the momentum boundary-layer thickness affects the magnetic field strength and thermal boundary layer in opposite ways, while retardation and relaxation time effects have opposite impacts on the temperature field. The results are valuable for understanding transport phenomena involving hydromagnetic rheological fluids.
A hydromagnetic transverse flow of an Oldroyd-B-type liquid with a heat flux of the Cattaneo-Christov model with variable thickness has been analyzed. Consider additional impacts of thermal conductivity as well as heat generation. Governing equations were transmitted into a set of nonlinear ordinary differential equations using similarity conversion, and then, numerical solution was evaluated using the procedure Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg. The physical response related to velocity and temperature is investigated computationally. The outcomes also show that the momentum boundary-layer thickness increases the values of magnetic field strength, but the reverse trend is observed for the thermal boundary layer. Impacts of retardation and relaxation time effects are quite the opposite of the temperature field. The obtained computations are useful in transport phenomena which are involving hydromagnetic rheological fluids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据