4.2 Article

Optimization of extraction conditions of polyphenols, antioxidant capacity and sun protection factor from Prunus spinosa fruits. Application in sunscreen formulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE IRANIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 2625-2636

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13738-021-02217-9

关键词

Blackthorn; Extraction; Polyphenols; DPPH; SPF

资金

  1. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CCCDI - UEFISCDI [18/01.09.2016, P_ 40_404/105533, 269/08.06.2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to obtain blackthorn extracts rich in polyphenols through reflux and sonication for sunscreen formulation. The optimal extraction conditions were determined to enhance antioxidant and sun protection properties, showing the importance of blackthorn extract in sunscreen formulations.
The aim of this work was to obtain different extracts rich in polyphenols of the blackthorn by reflux and sonication and to test them in sunscreen formulation. In order to obtain the maximum content of polyphenols, a high antioxidant capacity and a high sun protection factor of these extracts, a central composite design was employed to optimize the extraction parameters. The extraction time (30-150 min) and the ethanol concentration (40-80%) were considered for refluxing, and the extraction time (5-30 min), temperature (30-70 degrees C) and the ethanol concentration (40-80%) were for ultrasound-assisted extraction. The optimal conditions were found to be 30% ethanol concentration and the time 45 min for reflux extraction and the temperature 67 degrees C, the ethanol concentration 40% and time 10 min for ultrasound-assisted extraction. Due to antioxidant and photo protective properties of the blackthorn extract and its usage in sunscreen formulation, in vitro sun protection factor and photostability of the sunscreen formulation were also determined. Results from this study showed that the blackthorn fruit extract has importance utility in formulation with solar protection properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据