4.7 Article

Delay-dependent cluster synchronization of time-varying complex dynamical networks with noise via delayed pinning impulsive control

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.02.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61503282, 61703374]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China [2019CFB559]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2019IB012, 2020IB003]
  4. China Scholarship Council [CSC201906955010]
  5. NSERC Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates cluster synchronization of complex dynamical networks with noise and time-varying delays using a delayed pinning impulsive control scheme, establishing criteria to guarantee synchronization while revealing the relationship between performance and factors like impulsive input delays. The effectiveness of the theoretical results is demonstrated through numerical examples and computer simulations.
This paper investigates the problem of cluster synchronization of complex dynamical networks with noise and time-varying delays by using a delayed pinning impulsive control scheme. Different from the traditional impulsive control schemes without the effects of input delays, it designs a pinning impulsive control scheme to successfully address the aforementioned problem subject to impulsive input delays. By employing a time-dependent Lyapunov function and the mathematical induction, some novel criteria are established to guarantee the cluster synchronization of the noisy complex networks, revealing the closed relationship between the synchronization performance and the related factors, including the impulsive input delays, the number of the pinned nodes, the frequency and strength of the impulsive control, and the noisy perturbations. Some numerical examples and computer simulations are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the theoretical results. ? 2021 The Franklin Institute. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据