4.7 Article

Anisotropic mechanical and tribological properties of SiAlON matrix composites containing different types of GNPs

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 1878-1890

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.071

关键词

Lateral dimension of GNPs; Thickness of GNPs; Fracture toughness; Friction coefficient; Si3N4

资金

  1. Eskisehir Technical University Scientific Research Projects [1606F570, 19ADP019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, four different types of GNPs with varying properties were added to SiAlON, and it was found that GNPs with high surface area, lateral dimension, aspect ratio, and low thickness provided the highest fracture toughness and best friction performance to SiAlON. The orientation of GNPs played a role in influencing the fracture toughness, with generally higher values in the in-plane direction, while the through-plane direction exhibited higher friction coefficient and hardness values.
SiAlONs can have new application areas by increasing their lifetime and durability if their mechanical and tribological properties are improved. Even though the properties of the matrix improve with GNPs addition, the differences in GNPs properties lead to different property values. In this study, four different GNPs having different surface area, lateral dimension, thickness, and aspect ratio were added to SiAlON and composites were sintered by using SPS. The effects of these different properties on fracture toughness and friction coefficient of SiAlONs were investigated. GNPs, which have the high surface area, lateral dimension, aspect ratio and low thickness, provided the highest fracture toughness and best friction coefficient performance to SiAlON. The fracture toughness of composites were generally higher in the in-plane direction compared to through-plane direction due to GNPs orientation. Conversely, the friction coefficient and hardness values measured higher in the through-plane direction than in the in-plane direction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据