4.7 Article

Joining of Ti-coated monolithic SiC using a SiCw/Ti3SiC2 filler by electric field-assisted sintering

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 1834-1840

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.059

关键词

SiC; Joining; Ti3SiC2; Whisker; Electric field-assisted sintering

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11975296, 51811540402]
  2. Korea Ministry of Education [NRF-2018K2A9A2A06018203]
  3. Ningbo 3315 Innovative Teams Program, China [2019A-14-C]
  4. MVTS project of SAS UltraCom within the scheme of Support of the Seal of Excellence projects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monolithic SiC was successfully joined using a SiC whisker-reinforced Ti3SiC2 composite filler via electric field-assisted sintering technique, achieving a joint strength higher than 250 MPa. Optimization of process parameters and the addition of up to 15 wt. % SiC whiskers improved joint strength, but a lower joint strength was observed with 20 wt. % SiC whisker addition due to thermal expansion mismatch.
Monolithic SiC, for the first time, was successfully joined using a SiC whisker-reinforced Ti3SiC2 composite (SiCw/Ti3SiC2) filler via electric field-assisted sintering technique. A thin Ti coating layer was formed on the SiC surface to minimize the residual stress at the joint interface by transforming it into a TiC gradient layer. After optimizing process parameters, a joint strength higher than 250 MPa was obtained, which is higher than the other values reported in the literature. Failure occurred at the SiC base rather than the joining interface because of the improved joint strength by the incorporation of SiCw. The addition up to 15 wt. % SiCw in the filler layer improved the joint strength by various strengthening mechanisms. On the other hand, the joint strength was lower with 20 wt. % SiCw addition, indicating the importance of thermal expansion mismatch between SiCw and Ti3SiC2 to obtain a sound SiC joint.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据