4.6 Article

Proactive primary care model for frail older people in New Zealand delays aged-residential care: A quasi-experiment

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 69, 期 6, 页码 1617-1626

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17064

关键词

aged; comprehensive health care; geriatric assessment; patient care planning; primary health care

资金

  1. Waitemata DHB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proactive primary care program significantly reduced aged-residential care placement and mortality for frail older people in the first year, but did not decrease acute hospitalization. Caution is needed in interpreting these nonexperimental results.
Background/Objectives To determine the effect of a proactive primary care program on acute hospitalization and aged-residential care placement for frail older people. Design Controlled before and after, and controlled after only quasi-experimental studies, with a comparison group created via propensity score matching. One-year follow-up. Setting Nine general practices in Auckland, New Zealand. Participants Community-dwelling people aged 75 and older identified as at increased risk of hospitalization. One thousand and eighty five patients are compared with 3750 comparison patients matched by propensity score based on known risks. Intervention Primary healthcare based, registered nurse-led, comprehensive geriatric assessment, goal-setting, care planning, and regular follow-up. Patients were also provided self-management education, health and social care navigation, and transitional care for hospital discharges. Practices received program support, workforce development, and mentoring of primary healthcare nurses by gerontology nurse specialists. Measurements Outcomes from routinely collected administrative data. Primary: aged-residential care placement. Secondary outcomes: acute hospitalization, mortality, and other health service utilization. Results Aged-residential care placement (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.48-0.91) and mortality (OR 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49-0.88) were significantly lower over the first year in Kare patients compared with matched controls. There was no difference in acute hospitalization (+0.06 admissions per year, 95% CI = -0.01-0.13). Support service use (allied health therapists and assessment for social support) was increased, and emergency department use decreased. Conclusion The Kare participants had lower aged-residential care placement and mortality in the first year, but no decrease in acute hospitalization. Because the design is nonexperimental caution is required in interpreting these results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据