4.7 Article

Comparison of Management Strategies for Neonates With Symptomatic Tetralogy of Fallot

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 77, 期 8, 页码 1093-1106

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.048

关键词

neurodevelopmental outcomes; outcomes; palliation; staged repair; congenital heart disease

资金

  1. Kennedy Hammill Pediatric Cardiac Research Fund
  2. Liam Sexton Foundation
  3. A Heart Like Ava

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this multicenter comparison of staged repair (SR) and primary repair (PR) for neonates with symptomatic tetralogy of Fallot (sTOF), early mortality and neonatal morbidity were lower in the SR group, while cumulative morbidity and reinterventions favored the PR group, suggesting potential benefits to each strategy.
BACKGROUND Neonates with tetralogy of Fallot and symptomatic cyanosis (sTOF) require early intervention. OBJECTIVES This study sought to perform a balanced multicenter comparison of staged repair (SR) (initial palliation [IP] and subsequent complete repair [CR]) versus primary repair (PR) treatment strategies. METHODS Consecutive neonates with sTOF who underwent IP or PR at #30 days of age from 2005 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed from the Congenital Cardiac Research Collaborative. The primary outcome was death. Secondary outcomes included component (IP, CR, PR) and cumulative (SR): hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay; durations of cardiopulmonary bypass, anesthesia, ventilation, and inotrope use; and complication and reintervention rates. Outcomes were compared using propensity score adjustment. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 342 patients who underwent SR (IP: surgical, n = 256; transcatheter, n = 86) and 230 patients who underwent PR. Pre-procedural ventilation, prematurity, DiGeorge syndrome, and pulmonary atresia were more common in the SR group (p #0.01). The observed risk of death was not different between the groups (10.2% vs 7.4%; p = 0.25) at median 4.3 years. After adjustment, the hazard of death remained similar between groups (hazard ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.49 to 1.38; p = 0.456), but it favored SR during early follow-up (<4 months; p = 0.041). Secondary outcomes favored the SR group in component analysis, whereas they largely favored PR in cumulative analysis. Reintervention risk was higher in the SR group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter comparison of SR or PR for management of neonates with sTOF, adjusted for patient-related factors, early mortality and neonatal morbidity were lower in the SR group, but cumulative morbidity and reinterventions favored the PR group, findings suggesting potential benefits to each strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据