4.8 Article

Hysteretic Three-State Redox Interconversion among Zigzag Bisquinodimethanes with Non-fused Benzene Rings and Twisted Tetra-/Dications with [5]/[3]Acenes Exhibiting Near-Infrared Absorptions

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 143, 期 9, 页码 3306-3311

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c00189

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19K15528, JP20H02719, JP20K21184]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Octaaryl-substituted bisquinodimethanes (BQDs) with a zigzag structure were designed as redox-switchable molecules that can undergo four-electron oxidation to produce tetracationic pentacenes with a doubly twisted structure. By stepwise two-electron reduction, the tetracationic pentacenes can be transformed into dicationic anthracenes and then back to the original BQDs. The structures and UV-vis-NIR spectra of these molecules can be controlled by redox stimuli, as they exhibit near-infrared absorptions based on an intramolecular charge-transfer interaction.
Octaaryl-substituted bisquinodimethanes (BQDs) with a zigzag structure were designed as redox-switchable molecules that undergo four-electron oxidation to produce tetracationic pentacenes with a doubly twisted structure. In contrast to one-stage four-electron oxidation of BQDs, stepwise two-electron reduction of tetracationic pentacenes occurs to give dicationic anthracenes and then the original BQDs, step-by-step. Since both tetracations and dications exhibit near-infrared (NIR) absorptions (-1400 nm) based on an intramolecular charge-transfer interaction, changes in not only their structures but also their UV-vis-NIR spectra can be controlled by redox stimuli. In this Communication, we present an unprecedented one-step p-extension to pentacene from non-fused benzene rings by oxidation, and subsequent two-stage deannulation to benzene rings via anthracene upon reduction. All structures were determined by single-crystal X-ray analyses, and their properties were characterized by spectroscopic and theoretical studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据