4.5 Article

Spectral interleaving by singing humpback whales: Signs of sonar

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 149, 期 2, 页码 800-806

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0003443

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The duplex sonar model of humpback whale song suggests that singing whales alternate between broadband and narrowband units in order to increase the efficacy of their song as a sonar source. This study confirms two novel predictions of the model by showing the consistency and precision with which humpback whales interleave these different units.
The duplex sonar model of humpback whale song proposes that broadband units within songs function differently from narrowband units. Specifically, this model suggests that singing humpback whales interleave constant frequency (CF) units, which can generate prolonged reverberation focused at specific frequencies, with less reverberant broadband units that minimally overlap with the focal frequencies of preceding and following CF units (referred to as spectral interleaving) to increase the efficacy of song as a sonar source. Here, it is shown that singers recorded off the coast of Hawaii in 2015 devoted most of their time singing to spectrally interleaving broadband elements of units around quasi-CF components that consistently generated persistent reverberant tails. Singers maintained reverberant CF streams in specific frequency bands when units contained broadband elements and when singers switched from producing pairs of alternating reverberant units to producing a single reverberant unit. Additionally, singers showed the ability to flexibly control where acoustic energy was concentrated within broadband components in ways that minimized spectral overlap with the focal frequencies of reverberant tails. The consistency and precision with which singing humpback whales interleaved broadband and reverberant CF elements of units confirm two novel predictions of the duplex sonar model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据