4.6 Article

Does cattle and sheep grazing under best management significantly elevate sediment losses? Evidence from the North Wyke Farm Platform, UK

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 1875-1889

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-021-02909-y

关键词

Sediment yield; Grazing livestock; Soil damage; Livestock management; Stocking rate

资金

  1. UKRI (UK Research and Innovation) Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BBS/E/C/000 J0100]
  2. UKRI-BBSRC [BBS/E/C/000I0320, BBS/E/C/000I0330]
  3. Environment Agency [19936]
  4. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Agri-Tech Cornwall initiative
  5. University of Exeter
  6. University of Plymouth
  7. Rothamsted Research
  8. Cornwall Development Company
  9. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/000J0100, BBS/E/C/000I0330, BBS/E/C/000I0320] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intensive livestock grazing did not significantly impact sediment yields, likely due to clayey soils and limited trampling in certain areas. Best management practices and indoor housing during winter may have further reduced sediment losses. Additional targeted measures for erosion control in similar landscapes with well-managed livestock grazing may not yield significant cost benefits.
Purpose Intensive livestock grazing has been associated with an increased risk of soil erosion and concomitant negative impacts on the ecological status of watercourses. Whilst various mitigation options are promoted for reducing livestock impacts, there is a paucity of data on the relationship between stocking rates and quantified sediment losses. This evidence gap means there is uncertainty regarding the cost-benefit of policy preferred best management. Methods Sediment yields from 15 hydrologically isolated field scale catchments on a heavily instrumented ruminant livestock farm in the south west UK were investigated over similar to 26 months spread across 6 years. Sediment yields were compared to cattle and sheep stocking rates on long-term, winter (November-April), and monthly timescales. The impacts of livestock on soil vegetation cover and bulk density were also examined. Cattle were tracked using GPS collars to determine how grazing related to soil damage. Results No observable impact of livestock stocking rates of 0.15-1.00 UK livestock units (LU) ha(-1) for sheep, and 0-0.77 LU ha(-1) for cattle on sediment yields was observed at any of the three timescales. Cattle preferentially spent time close to specific fences where soils were visually damaged. However, there was no indication that livestock have a significant effect on soil bulk density on a field scale. Livestock were housed indoors during winters when most rainfall occurs, and best management practices were used which when combined with low erodibility clayey soils likely limited sediment losses. Conclusion A combination of clayey soils and soil trampling in only a small proportion of the field areas lead to little impact from grazing livestock. Within similar landscapes with best practice livestock grazing management, additional targeted measures to reduce erosion are unlikely to yield a significant cost-benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据