4.8 Article

Lithium metal anode with lithium borate layer for enhanced cycling stability of lithium metal batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 485, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229286

关键词

Lithium metal; Lithium borate; Passivation; Anode; Cycling stability

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2020R1A2C1013303]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2C1013303] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on pre-treating lithium metal to form a lithium borate layer to enhance the cycling stability and safety of lithium batteries, as well as improve the rate capability of the cells.
Lithium metal is one of the most promising next generation anode materials to make a leap of the energy density of conventional lithium-ion batteries. However, lithium metal has fatal problems to overcome in cycling stability and safety. In this study, lithium metal is pre-treated to form a lithium borate layer (LBL) on the surface to suppress dendritic growth of lithium and stabilize the interface between the carbonate-based electrolyte and anode. The pre-treated lithium metal greatly enhances the cycling stability of the cells (Li parallel to Li symmetric and LiMn2O4 (LMO) parallel to Li cells). Especially, cycling test with the LMO parallel to Li cell reveals the pre-treatment with boric acid is more effective approach than addition of boric acid in the electrolyte because water is continuously generated during charge/discharge in the latter case and it causes side reactions and degrades the cycling performance. The LBL along with LiF stabilizes the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer and suppresses the dendritic growth of lithium. Due to the lithium-ion conducting ability of lithium borate, the pre-treated lithium anode also shows lower interfacial resistance than the pristine lithium and enhances rate capability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据