4.8 Article

Unlocking extra value from grid batteries using advanced models

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 487, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229355

关键词

Lithium-ion; Degradation; Lifetime; Battery; Energy trading

资金

  1. VITO
  2. EPSRC [EP/S003053/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-ion batteries are increasingly used in liberalized electricity systems driven by economic optimization. A physics-based degradation model can decrease battery degradation and increase revenue. The approach increases battery lifetime in terms of years and cycles, while also improving revenue potential.
Lithium-ion batteries are increasingly being deployed in liberalised electricity systems, where their use is driven by economic optimisation in a specific market context. However, battery degradation depends strongly on operational profile, and this is particularly variable in energy trading applications. Here, we present results from a year-long experiment where pairs of batteries were cycled with profiles calculated by solving an economic optimisation problem for wholesale energy trading, including a physically-motivated degradation model as a constraint. The results confirm the conclusions of previous simulations and show that this approach can increase revenue by 20% whilst simultaneously decreasing degradation by 30% compared to existing methods. Analysis of the data shows that conventional approaches cannot increase the number of cycles a battery can manage over its lifetime, but the physics-based approach increases the lifetime both in terms of years and number of cycles, as well as the revenue per year, increasing the possible lifetime revenue by 70%. Finally, the results demonstrate the economic impact of model inaccuracies, showing that the physics-based model can reduce the discrepancy in the overall business case from 170% to 13%. There is potential to unlock significant extra performance using control engineering incorporating physical models of battery ageing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据