4.5 Article

First-principles investigations of ZnO monolayers derived from zinc-blende and 5-5 phases for advanced thermoelectric applications

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109780

关键词

ZnO; Monolayers; Electronic structure calculations; Power factor; zT

资金

  1. Research Center of the Female Scientific and Medical Colleges, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the thermoelectric response of two novel 2D polymorphs of ZnO under first-principles calculations, revealing that p-type doping significantly enhances the thermoelectric power factor (PF) and shows great potential, especially in the case of the ZnO(5-5) monolayer.
Two-dimensional (2D) materials have received substantial interest in recycling waste heat via the thermoelectric approach in recent years. In this article, we investigate the thermoelectric response of two novel 2D polymorphs of ZnO derived from the zinc-blende phase (ZnO(zb)) and 5-5 phase (ZnO(5-5)) for advance thermoelectric applications by first-principles. The thermoelectric behavior of these 2D polymorphs of ZnO has been evaluated from calculations of the thermoelectric power factor (PF) and figure-of-merit (zT) values. The p-type of doping results in the enhancement of PF for both monolayers of ZnO. The highest values of PF have been accordingly determined as 15.70 x 10(10) W/mK(2)s at -2.40 eV for single-layered ZnO(zb) and 25.08 x 10(10) W/mK(2) s at -1.81 eV for ZnO(5-5) monolayer. The recorded PF of single-layered ZnO(zb) has been found to decline slightly whereas a drastic increase in the PF of ZnO(5-5) monolayer has been recorded with an increase in temperature. Like PF, the zT values of these monolayers have been found larger for p-type doping of magnitude 0.583 and 0.977 respectively for ZnO(zb) and ZnO(5-5) monolayers. The predictions suggest the ZnO monolayers (ZnO(5-5) in particular) as promising candidates for advanced thermoelectric applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据