4.8 Article

Bimolecular and Auger Recombination in Phase-Stable Perovskite Thin Films from Cryogenic to Room Temperature and Their Effect on the Amplified Spontaneous Emission Threshold

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 2293-2298

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00099

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [409035484]
  2. Karlsruhe School of Optics & Photonics (KSOP)
  3. Helmholtz Energy Materials Foundry (HEMF)
  4. Excellence Cluster 3D Matter Made to Order (3DMM2O)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates room temperature continuous-wave lasing in quasi-2D perovskites, while highlighting the challenges in achieving the same in 3D films. By investigating bimolecular and Auger recombination rates in a phase-stable 3D perovskite, with the help of high-index substrates, the researchers observed a decrease in the bimolecular recombination coefficient with increasing temperature, influencing the temperature dependence of ASE threshold.
Recently, continuous-wave (CW) lasing was demonstrated at room temperature in quasi-2D perovskites. For 3D films, CW lasing at room temperature remains challenging. Issues hampering 3D materials include the temperature dependence of the (a) distribution of carrier energies, (b) buildup of photoinduced nonradiative channels, and (c) rates of bimolecular versus Auger recombination. We study the latter in a phase-stable 3D perovskite using high-index substrates to completely suppress amplified spontaneous emission (ASE). The bimolecular recombination coefficient decreases from 80 to 290 K (from (6.4 to 1.1) x 10(-10) cm(-3) s(-1)), whereas the Auger coefficient stays constant at 3 x 10(-29) cm(-6) s(-1). Above 250 K, the Auger rate exceeds the bimolecular rate at carrier densities corresponding to the ASE threshold. At lower temperatures, the decrease in the bimolecular rate coefficient with increasing temperature and the fraction of photoluminescence in the ASE band determine the temperature dependence of the ASE threshold.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据