4.5 Article

Biomolecular Condensates: Sequence Determinants of Phase Separation, Microstructural Organization, Enzymatic Activity, and Material Properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 125, 期 14, 页码 3441-3451

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c11606

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01NS116176, R01GM120537]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR2004796, CBET1929237]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This perspective article reviews recent advances and challenges in understanding the formation and function of membraneless organelles, emphasizing the diverse molecular organization within biomolecular condensates and the potential impact of liquid-like material properties on enzymatic activity. The need for improved quantitative characterization tools and the development of sequence-structure-dynamics relationships is also discussed.
This perspective article highlights recent progress and emerging challenges in understanding the formation and function of membraneless organelles (MLOs). A long-term goal in the MLO field is to identify the sequence-encoded rules that dictate the formation of compositionally controlled biomolecular condensates, which cells utilize to perform a wide variety of functions. The molecular organization of the different components within a condensate can vary significantly, ranging from a homogeneous mixture to core-shell droplet structures. We provide many examples to highlight the richness of the observed behavior and potential research directions for improving our mechanistic understanding. The tunable environment within condensates can, in principle, alter enzymatic activity significantly. We examine recent examples where this was demonstrated, including applications in synthetic biology. An important question about MLOs is the role of liquid-like material properties in biological function. We discuss the need for improved quantitative characterization tools and the development of sequencestructuredynamics relationships.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据