4.5 Article

Development and Validation of a DFT-Based Force Field for a Hydrated Homoalanine Polypeptide

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 125, 期 6, 页码 1568-1581

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c11618

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [1R01GM120578, 2P20GM103429]
  2. Arkansas High Performance Computing Center
  3. Arkansas Bioscience Institute [1R01GM120578]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new force field AFM2020 has been developed using the adaptive force matching method for simulating hydrated alanine polypeptides, showing better accuracy compared to other models. The force field predicts different conformations for Ala(7), with a higher helical population than previous estimates based on the same experimental data. Gas-phase simulations suggest that the force field developed from AFM solution-phase data may produce a reasonable conformation distribution in the absence of hydration water, such as the interior of a protein.
A new force field has been created for simulating hydrated alanine polypeptides using the adaptive force matching (AFM) method. Only density functional theory calculations using the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional and the D3 dispersion correction were used to fit the force field. The new force field, AFM2020, predicts NMR scalar coupling constants for hydrated homopolymeric alanine in better agreements with experimental data than several other models including those fitted directly to such data. For Ala(7), the new force field shows about 15% helical conformations, 20% conformation in the beta basin, and 65% polyproline II. The predicted helical population of short hydrated alanine is higher than previous estimates based on the same experimental data. Gas-phase simulations indicate that the force field developed by AFM solution-phase data is likely to produce a reasonable conformation distribution when hydration water is no longer present, such as the interior of a protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据