4.6 Article

Phase II stanozolol metabolism study using the zebrafish water tank (ZWT) model

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113886

关键词

Zebrafish water tank; LC-HRMS/MS; Phase II metabolism; Stanozolol; Doping control

资金

  1. CAPES
  2. Brazilian Ministry of Sports

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stanozolol metabolism was investigated in Zebrafish Water Tank, producing hydroxylated-sulfate, hydroxylated-glycoconjugate, and glucuronide metabolites. STAN-O-Glucuronide was the most intense phase II metabolite, requiring high concentrations of fish and substrate for formation.
Stanozolol (STAN) is an androgen anabolic steroid often misused in sports competitions and prohibited at all times by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). It can be long term detected by the analysis of human urine for traces of intact glucuronide metabolites. The Zebrafish Water Tank (ZWT) experimental setup can produce phase I STAN metabolites. In the present study, we investigated the in vivo phase II metabolism of STAN through the ZWT model to determine whether the ZWT produces metabolites relevant for doping control. We added STAN to a 200 mL recipient containing eight fish at 32 +/- 1 degrees C. We analyzed the noninvasive samples (recipient water) both with and without pretreatment using Liquid Chromatography coupled with High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS) in positive ionization mode. Our data show that four hydroxylated-sulfate and four hydroxylated-glycoconjugate metabolites were formed, two of the last ones being 3'OH-STAN-Glucuronide and 16 beta-OH-STAN-Glucuronide. Additionally, two STAN-Glucuronide derivatives were produced: one was confirmed to be 17epi-STAN-N-Glucuronide, and the other was presumed to be STAN-O-Glucuronide. After eight hours of the experiment, STAN-O-Glucuronide was the most intense phase II metabolite produced. The accumulation curves suggest that high concentrations of fish and substrate in water are required to form phase II metabolites. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据