4.3 Review

Primary pulmonary vein stenosis during infancy: state of the art review

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
卷 41, 期 7, 页码 1528-1539

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01008-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ohio Perinatal Research Network within the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the US National Institutes of Health [R01HL145032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary pulmonary vein stenosis (PPVS) is an emerging issue among infants, with developing understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Multidisciplinary teams are essential for reviewing evidence and providing a common framework for diagnosis and treatment. Institutional and multi-institutional collaboration is crucial to generate specific knowledge and advance research on this rare disease.
Primary pulmonary vein stenosis (PPVS) is an emerging problem among infants. In contrast to acquired disease, PPVS is the development of stenosis in the absence of preceding intervention. While optimal care approaches remain poorly characterized, over the past decade, understanding of potential pathophysiological mechanisms and development of novel therapeutic strategies are increasing. A multidisciplinary team of health care providers was assembled to review the available evidence and provide a common framework for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of PPVS during infancy. To address knowledge gaps, institutional and multi-institutional approaches must be employed to generate knowledge specific to ex-premature infants with PPVS. Within individual institutions, creation of a team comprised of dedicated health care providers from diverse backgrounds is critical to accelerate clinical learning and provide care for infants with PPVS. Multi-institutional collaborations, such as the PVS Network, provide the infrastructure and statistical power to advance knowledge for this rare disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据